This project will run at the end of the Grade 10 Asia and the World course. It will aim to empower students to formulate their own research inquiries based on a choice of selected topics. This initiative seeks to provide students with an opportunity to investigate their chosen subject and to leverage the skills and knowledge they have acquired throughout the duration of the course.
This guide will go over the following stages:
Question Formulation
Research
Writing process
A compelling question is a question that is thought-provoking, open-ended, and engages students in critical thinking and inquiry. It is designed to spark curiosity, promote exploration of multiple perspectives, and encourage deeper understanding of a topic.
Social Studies:
Science:
Non-examples of compelling questions would be questions that have a simple, factual answer or do not require critical thinking or analysis. For example:
These questions can be easily answered with a quick search or basic knowledge, and do not prompt deeper exploration or critical thinking.
Open-ended: Make sure the question does not have a simple "yes" or "no" answer. It should prompt critical thinking and encourage discussion.
Relevant: The question should be related to the topic being studied and should be of interest to students.
Thought-provoking: Choose a question that challenges students to think critically, analyze information, and consider multiple perspectives.
Multifaceted: The question should allow for exploration of different aspects or viewpoints on the topic.
Real-world connection: Consider how the question relates to real-world issues or experiences to make it more engaging and relevant to students.
By following these guidelines, you can create compelling questions that will engage students in deeper learning and inquiry.
Source: Lekanides, Kosta. IB Extended Essay Course Book. Oxford IB Diploma Programme, 2016.
This video is geared toward PhD students, but it gives good advice for how to use AI to refine your ideas.
Information about the source:
Summary and Paraphrase:
Facts and Figures:
Quotations:
Key Terms:
Response and Analysis:
Adapted from “Useful Research Notes.” Academic Skills - Trent University, www.trentu.ca/academicskills/how-guides/how-use-sources/research-process/useful-research-notes.
Before you read or share an article or video, STOP!
Be aware of your emotional response to the headline or information in the article. Headlines are often meant to get clicks, and will do so by causing the reader to have a strong emotional response.
Before sharing, consider:
What you already know about the topic.
What you know about the source. Do you know it's reputation?
Before moving forward or sharing, use the other three moves: Investigate the Source, Find Better Coverage, and Trace Claims, Quotes, and Media back to the Original Context.
The next step before sharing is to Investigate the Source.
Take a moment to look up the author and source publishing the information.
What can you find about the author/website creators?
What is their mission? Do they have vested interests? Would their assessment be biased?
Do they have authority in the area?
Use lateral reading. Go beyond the 'About Us' section on the organization's website and see what other, trusted sources say about the source. You can use Google or Wikipedia to investigate the source.
Hovering is another technique to learn more about who is sharing information, especially on social media platforms such as Twitter.
The Standford Experiment
The next step is to Find Better Coverage or other sources that may or may not support the original claim.
Again, use lateral reading to see if you can find other sources corroborating the same information or disputing it.
What coverage is available on the topic?
Keep track of trusted news sources.
Many times, fact checkers have already looked into the claims. These fact-checkers are often nonpartisan, nonprofit websites that try to increase public knowledge and understanding by fact checking claims to see if they are based on fact or if they are biased/not supported by evidence.
The final step is to Trace Claims, Quotes, and Media to their Original Context.
When an article references a quote from an expert, or results of a research study, it is good practice to attempt to locate the original source of the information. Click through the links to follow the claims to the original source of information. Open up the original reporting sources listed in a bibliography if present
Was the claim, quote, or media fairly represented?
Does the extracted information support the original claims in the research?
Is information being cherry-picked to support an agenda or a bias?
Is information being taken out of context?
Remember, headlines, blog posts, or tweets may sensationalize facts to get more attention or clicks. Re-reporting may omit, misinterpret, or select certain facts to support biased claims. If the claim is taken from a source who took it from another source, important facts and contextual information can be left out. Make sure to read the claims in the original context in which they were presented.
When in doubt, contact an expert – like a librarian!
The SIFT method is an evaluation strategy developed by digital literacy expert, Mike Caulfield, to help determine whether online content can be trusted for credible or reliable sources of information. All SIFT information on this page is adapted from the University of Chicago's adaptation of Caulfield's materials with a CC BY 4.0 license.
The playlist above is a bit old, but the information is still relevant and very very useful.
Introduction: introduce the topic, provide any background information your reader might need, and state the thesis
Body: this section might be divided into 3 or 4 parts which each say more about your thesis and build to prove your argument.
Conclusion: restates the thesis and summarizes the key points that answer the thesis; mentions limitations or questions that still remain.
A Jane Schaffer paragraph is a structured writing method. It consists of a topic sentence, concrete details, commentary, and a concluding sentence:
The topic sentence introduces the main idea of the paragraph
The concrete details provide specific examples or evidence to support the main idea
The commentary explains or analyzes the concrete details
The concluding sentence summarizes the main point of the paragraph
This format helps students learn how to organize their thoughts and write cohesive paragraphs.
CLICK the link to watch the video on YouTube
1. Cite your source
2. Include quotations
3. Paraphrase
4. Use your own idea
5. Use a plagiarism checker